| Printable Version of Topic
Click here to view this topic in its original format |
| Open Forums for ExChristian.Net > Old Board > Nudie Pics, for or against |
| Posted by: sexkitten Oct 15 2004, 02:11 PM |
| Do you support the idea of a special thread where members can post TASTEFUL pics w/o clothing? Yes, I support the idea. [ 32 ] [49.23%] No, I don't support the idea. [ 2 ] [3.08%] Yes, I support and would participate. [ 7 ] [10.77%] Yes, I support the idea but wouldn't participate. [ 24 ] [36.92%] Total Votes: 65 |
| Posted by: sexkitten Oct 15 2004, 02:15 PM |
| Printable Version of Topic Click here to view this topic in its original format ExChristian.Net Open Forums > Sex and Christianity > Nudie Pics Posted by: brick May 6 2004, 05:58 AM It occurred while reading reach's 'Self-Body image' thread that some members might like to post more revealing pics of themselves for the benefit of their self-esteem (as was done without ceremony by sexkitten, no offence intended kitty!) or just to parade around and play 'look at me' (hey, why not! we're all adults here and there is nothing wrong with the naked body, IMO) Express your thoughts and/or concerns....and remember that it would be a thread for TASTEFUL pics, not a freakin' porn thread! lol Posted by: sexkitten May 6 2004, 07:20 AM Anyone want to guess what my response was? Posted by: Reach May 6 2004, 07:45 AM QUOTE (sexkitten @ May 6 2004, 10:20 AM) Anyone want to guess what my response was? We already KNOW. We don't need to GUESS. Posted by: sexkitten May 6 2004, 07:55 AM QUOTE (reach @ May 6 2004, 07:45 AM) QUOTE (sexkitten @ May 6 2004, 10:20 AM) Anyone want to guess what my response was? We already KNOW. We don't need to GUESS. Posted by: Reach May 6 2004, 07:59 AM Kitty, one might say that you removed quite a bit of the guesswork from the picture. Posted by: sexkitten May 6 2004, 08:02 AM Posted by: Cerise May 6 2004, 09:38 AM I can just imagine what my dad would do if he found nude pics of me on his digital camera... Oh wait a sec. Nope, no, I can't. Posted by: yanra May 6 2004, 09:46 AM Okay, who goes first? hehehehe Posted by: Emperor Norton II May 6 2004, 09:58 AM Hmmm... I wonder what Alexy'd think of this... mayhaps we could post some stuff together Posted by: sexkitten May 6 2004, 10:05 AM Group nudes rock! Posted by: Muggy Knubber May 6 2004, 10:09 AM I'm cool with it as long as it doesn't end up just being a lot of dudes taking pictures of their Woodrow and posting it here. Posted by: Cerise May 6 2004, 10:13 AM QUOTE as long as it doesn't end up just being a lot of dudes taking pictures of their Woodrow and posting it here. If I wanted to see that I'd go into a yahoo chat room at any given time and claim to be twelve years old. *shudders* Posted by: yanra May 6 2004, 10:29 AM QUOTE If I wanted to see that I'd go into a yahoo chat room at any given time and claim to be twelve years old. *shudders* So that's how you get into chat rooms..... I'm a groupy. Posted by: Muggy Knubber May 6 2004, 11:00 AM Huh? Posted by: yanra May 6 2004, 11:25 AM Posted by: Muggy Knubber May 6 2004, 11:38 AM Posted by: sexkitten May 6 2004, 11:40 AM Dude, that picture is scary... Posted by: Alexy_Lady May 6 2004, 11:43 AM QUOTE (Emperor Norton II @ May 6 2004, 09:58 AM) Hmmm... I wonder what Alexy'd think of this... mayhaps we could post some stuff together Nice try Emperor... Posted by: Lokmer May 6 2004, 12:24 PM The thing is, Muggy, both of those women who are dressed weirdly who you posted pictures of --- both of them would look very good naked, in just a simple basic nude pic (and both would be excellent models for painting). They obviously are not inhibited, since they can be playful enough to pose in those god-awful outfits. I think you just made the point for us. We **should** post nudes! And I'm not kidding. Brick, this is an excellent idea. -Lokmer Posted by: sexkitten May 6 2004, 03:04 PM Perhaps we need a new thread for tacky costumed pictures, and leave this one for tasteful nude pictures. Posted by: Lokmer May 6 2004, 03:13 PM Better yet, since this thread is actually just a poll, we should start a new one for just pics. -Lokmer Posted by: Quicksand May 6 2004, 04:17 PM Reminds me of my 1st day of art school. My first class was a drawing class. Now I am not an artist but a designer by trade. When I was 25 I decided to head back to college and get my degree so here I am with a bunch of 18 year olds on my 1st day of art school and in a drawing class...suffice to say I didnt know what to expect. Well the instructor started explaining that part of the class was still life and the other part was figure drawing, nude figure drawing. I was like cool cindy crawford! hubba hubba! well as I am having one of my hourly fantasies, this time enchanced, I noticed this guy not really paying attention to the lecture. futhermore i saw no drawing pad or tackle box. he was skinny, balding, looked like he smoked too much, and had a mullet springin from the back of head juxaposed by a shinny bald head. well you guessed it....he was the model. my dreams of cindy in delicsous poses quickly vanquished. the guy was really really really skinny, almost emciated. i must rather draw a womenly rubenseque figure than an emciated figure. much easier to draw. skinny guys no way. i did get to draw Dick Bacon before he died. He was Mr. Nude America or something like that in the 50's. Cool guy. one post-script.... when my gf and I would be driving around town i would occasionaly see some of the model I drawed. I would mention in passing that I have seen her naked, or him shouldva seen her face LOL Posted by: bob May 6 2004, 05:38 PM Here is a picture I shot of my wife recently. (shhh, don't tell her she is now all over the web) Posted by: bob May 6 2004, 05:39 PM Here is another one, a tad more revealing Posted by: Quicksand May 6 2004, 06:14 PM QUOTE (bob @ May 6 2004, 05:39 PM) Here is another one, a tad more revealing she's got great ass-ets. i couldnt resist that one. Posted by: SpaceFalcon2001 May 6 2004, 08:34 PM I'd like to hear from tocis on this one. Germany has tasteful nudity all over their advertising. Posted by: fortunehooks May 6 2004, 08:51 PM i have no qualms about nude pictures of any members on the site. if you want to post a pleasantly naked picture of yourself,by all means do it. i only wish i could participate,and then i could hire a statistician to record the invitations from female trolls who come to the site. i don't mean to sound to boastful,but i think i have a great body. Posted by: mandylibra1979 May 7 2004, 06:47 AM bob- The pictures of your wife are gorgeous! much love mandy Posted by: bob May 7 2004, 09:59 AM Thanks Mandy. She is out of town at the moment, but when she returns I'll show her where they are and the comments. Posted by: Fweethawt May 7 2004, 10:52 AM QUOTE (bob @ May 7 2004, 01:59 PM) Thanks Mandy. She is out of town at the moment, but when she returns I'll show her where they are and the comments. Bob, The only way that you're going to be able to do that is if she doesn't break your fingers. Posted by: Lokmer May 7 2004, 10:58 AM Bob, I think I may have mentioned this months ago, but from one photographer to another, you have an excellent eye. The pictures are wonderful pieces of art. Thanks for sharing! -Lokmer Posted by: bob May 7 2004, 11:42 AM QUOTE (Lokmer @ May 7 2004, 10:58 AM) Bob, I think I may have mentioned this months ago, but from one photographer to another, you have an excellent eye. The pictures are wonderful pieces of art. Thanks for sharing! -Lokmer Thanks Lokmer. BTW, I hope you don't think your dark and mysterious picture you posted will protect your shy posterior. In a matter of seconds I had you laying there in all your bright, naked glory, right on my monitor, thanks to Photoshop. Posted by: Lokmer May 7 2004, 12:58 PM Actually, it was because my lighting equipment wasn't easily accessible. I couldn't find a way to brighten is so it still looked nice Have a good one. -Lokmer Posted by: humanwill May 7 2004, 03:19 PM all hail Paint Shop Pro!!! Posted by: ericf May 7 2004, 05:39 PM Personally, I would support the idea and maybe even would participate if, and this is a big if, there was some way to restrict the thread (viewing and otherwise) to us dirty heathens or people who are trustworthy. I wouldn't mind reach taking a peek but having Aryan and some of the other virulant personalities looking over the thread would bother me. Worst case scenario access to the list is restricted to those who participate (I really think that goes too far but it might be easier to accomplish). Frankly, I don't want my wang plastered all over the web. I wouldn't mind sharing with people I trust, knowing it would stay in that limited group, but I just am not ready to share with the world. Posted by: Doug2 May 7 2004, 05:43 PM Eric, I think it would be great to have a private area for just such a thing. People can be invited to it once they are known by the people on the board and we know things said, shown will be in confidence. I have held back at times from what I have said because it would reveal to much to any lurkers. Posted by: ericf May 7 2004, 05:56 PM Doug, maybe we should ask Dave if it is possible to set up something like that? And if it wouldn't be too much of a hassle. I don't want to create hours of work or anything. Once it is setup I couldn't see it creating too much work. As long as the moderators who already exist could add access rights to acceptable people. It could contain all sorts of threads that just are too personal to share with the world. Maybe it is just wishful thinking but it is nice to know I am not the only person who wonders what people are reading my posts... Posted by: bob May 7 2004, 06:11 PM As far as I know, none of my friends or family visit this website or even know about it. I doubt that any more than a few people in my small community have ever visited it. The pictures I have posted in the "tasteful nudes" thread do not allow the viewer to recognize the subject. It would seem to me that should be sufficient to keep us safe. Am I incorrect? Posted by: Lanakila May 7 2004, 06:13 PM Not only a privacy issue, but an age limit needs to be placed as well. I think for both viewing and/or posting. My ass is at the other site, and enough people have seen it already I think. I wouldn't dream of posting it somewhere that was an open to eveyone place. Posted by: bob May 7 2004, 06:18 PM uh...Lanakila...what other site....please...? Posted by: ericf May 7 2004, 06:26 PM Ah Lana, thanks for reminding me... I hadn't looked at it today. Imagine a day without looking at that glorious image. Don't worry... I rectified that problem. It was actually that site that got me thinking about something similar over here. I have a larger post history here and feel more connected to most of the people here. But sometimes it seems less like a gathering of friends and more like an open arena. I walk naked around my house... those people I would invite into my house are welcome to see what they might. I don't walk naked into the foodstore... sometimes this place feels more like the foodstore. Hmm, time to look at that ass again. WOW! Hot. Posted by: Doug2 May 7 2004, 06:38 PM I also things the mods should maintain a list of users who have access to that area and have that list available inside. Two things concern me though. The first is hurt feelings and segregation in the community. I think we can keep this to a minimum though by mods using their heads. The second thing is that I am afraid that area will become the most used area, but if that is what the people want, then so be it. This site really isn't here to be a testimony to christians anyway. Posted by: ericf May 7 2004, 06:47 PM Well, I agree that it could hurt some people who are excluded. But over time, if they demonstrate their ability to join the community, they will get accepted into that area. Hmm, maybe the section could be made to not even show up unless you were part of the group. Like the moderation options at the bottom of threads... they are there for threads I start but not for ones I didn't. Do you know what I am saying? I don't know that it would be the most used area. Maybe it will -- but, like you said, that would be because it is what the community desired. I tend to think it wouldn't because there are tons of topics that aren't personal enough for me to consider posting there. I wouldn't have posted my cousin thread in the area... I wouldn't post other things... just the really intimate stuff. I think if those who are part of it are discrete (not talking about it like it is some club or something) many people might not even know it exists. Or if the link is visible it might be named something like (Moderator Board Discussion) and they would just assume they weren't supposed to have access. Although that implies a leadership that hides its actions which is also not desirable. I don't know... it is hard to deal with because we don't want to hurt people but we would need to discriminate somehow. Posted by: Doug2 May 7 2004, 07:01 PM Eric, I was thinking the same thing about it being invisible. A good idea is not to mention it too often, but it will be mentioned. We have threads like this here to insure that. Posted by: bob May 7 2004, 07:07 PM It doesn't even have to be mentioned at all. Kind of like a secret club that only those who are members know it even exists, though I have no idea how something like that would be made. I know my pbase galleries (where "the forum friends" pictures are) can be made none public, so that only those with the link can view the pictures...I believe. Posted by: Dar' Argol May 7 2004, 07:15 PM Invision PB has the abiliy to make either a "hidden" section that is acceible only through an address or to have forums visible only to certain members. I thin PB even has it set up where a member can be "promoted" to a group when he/she has received XXX amount of posts. So you could have it set up where say . . . for instance . . . once you reach 200 posts, you get promoted to this group, that has it set up in Admin controls that you have the ablity to "see" this hidden forum. And any other user group above it then would also have access. Its also the same as a "Moderator" forum. Almost the same set up. That might be the best plan . . . Expecially if any younguns come in perchace. Posted by: Doug2 May 7 2004, 07:21 PM great! I think the best way is to manually add members. Just getting 200 posts doesn't mean anything in this regard. Posted by: Dar' Argol May 7 2004, 07:31 PM QUOTE (Doug2 @ May 7 2004, 11:21 PM) great! I think the best way is to manually add members. Just getting 200 posts doesn't mean anything in this regard. Yeah, this is true. I know that Invisionfree boards, which I have and they are the free version of Invision Powerboards, Allows me to over-ride a users group to stick them in another while they still go through the post ranks. I think PB does it too. Bit it is a good point you make Doug2 . . . . . is there a Doug3 I need to look out for . . . . like a update?? he he he . . nevermind . . . I'm just tired right now Posted by: ericf May 7 2004, 07:31 PM Yeah I agree on the manual thing. Look at how many posts some of the members that aren't really part of the community have. And it might take some people more posts to prove they are part of the group and some people will obviously fit in right away. I think it might even be wise to have a thread in the section to discuss promoting people who have less than a certain amount of posts (the mods can just promote obvious people with tons of posts) so we can talk about if they are really part of the community yet. lol, way too much thought about this. Posted by: Dar' Argol May 7 2004, 07:36 PM Actually not really. On another messageboard I belong to and Moderate (Star Wars . . I'm a geek) there is a hidden area. It was created for those idividuals who as a "certain" kind of humor that is not widely accepted there. And there have been discussions within that area on who we wanted to bring in, who would fit in the mix well, who had that insane spark that the rest of us had. Now we also left it kinda open too. It is just hidden, not a view per group only thing. So if one of use posted in there and you check the last post by that member, it would show there and they could follow that link in. But usually it was only the crazy people that fit well that found ther way in Posted by: humanwill May 8 2004, 12:35 PM I co-admin a board on ezboard.com and within boards there you can create forums that are invisible to public and create passwords to the forum and you can select to give out the password or you have the option to manually enter the member name through the admin panel behind the scenes so that the password doesn't get out.... maybe think about it... and you can have pics on there as long as they aren't in public view and are private and out of sight.... and don't cross copyright infirngement, etc.... you could always give the link out to members you screen out that you deem reliable, the right age, etc... consider it... http://www.ezboard.com just a thought... Posted by: Reach May 8 2004, 06:47 PM QUOTE (ericf @ May 7 2004, 08:39 PM) I wouldn't mind reach taking a peek... I wouldn't mind sharing with people I trust, knowing it would stay in that limited group, but I just am not ready to share with the world. Thank you Eric, for the compliment. Nevertheless, you have me blushing. Red-faced Reach Posted by: Dar' Argol May 8 2004, 07:19 PM QUOTE (humanwill @ May 8 2004, 04:35 PM) I co-admin a board on ezboard.com and within boards there you can create forums that are invisible to public and create passwords to the forum and you can select to give out the password or you have the option to manually enter the member name through the admin panel behind the scenes so that the password doesn't get out.... maybe think about it... and you can have pics on there as long as they aren't in public view and are private and out of sight.... and don't cross copyright infirngement, etc.... you could always give the link out to members you screen out that you deem reliable, the right age, etc... consider it... http://www.ezboard.com just a thought... The same can be done with Invision PB, which is what this board is. Ezboard has always seemed too pop upish to me. But why change boards when the options are there on thisd one. Anywho, sorry for kinda hijacking the thread . . . We now return you to your regular nudiness Posted by: ericf May 9 2004, 02:14 AM Not to continue the non-nakedness... but I think our racist friend just proved, once again, the need for a private area. Is anyone else disgusted by how aryan is destroying Bob's very personal thread? Maybe when I get off of work this morning I will write a proposal in pm and send it to Dave for consideration. Some people piss me off sometimes. Posted by: GodzillaBless May 9 2004, 07:32 AM http://www.angelfire.com/rebellion/connie_the_naturist and for those parents who protest: A. this is NOT a porn site, there is no sexual activity displayed! B. don't come crying to me because you can't be bothered to supervise what your kid is looking at online! C. its not just pictures but lots of good information too. So there. Anyone who's anyone can see me naked any time they want. I don't particularly care -- enter at your own risk. Posted by: Doug2 May 9 2004, 09:05 PM QUOTE Maybe when I get off of work this morning I will write a proposal in pm and send it to Dave for consideration. Let us know how it goes. The only thing left to consider is if there will be an age restriction. Posted by: ericf May 10 2004, 01:05 PM I got off work and was routed into a family trip across the state. I just got home and might take a nap. I'll write it tonight. Maybe... Posted by: Lokmer May 10 2004, 01:42 PM Beautiful pics, Zilla! -Lokmer Posted by: biggles7268 May 10 2004, 02:37 PM agree with Lok Posted by: ericf May 10 2004, 03:50 PM Hmm Zilla... nice. Just one question that has always made me wonder: Why do naturists/nudists always (usually) wear shoes? Sorry, maybe it is just me. But you look very good and comfortable in your skin. Posted by: Muggy Knubber May 10 2004, 04:44 PM Does this count as a tasteful nude? Posted by: phoenix May 10 2004, 09:18 PM that's frightening! but the even scarier thing is, it mesmorized me for a bit. yay for dancing penis'... Posted by: Quicksand May 11 2004, 05:37 AM a dancing beanpole! hahahahaha very funny Posted by: sexkitten May 11 2004, 07:31 AM Hmmm... I don't think that counts as either tasteful or nude... However... if semi-nude celebs are acceptable, then here's something more tasteful (and tasty!)... Posted by: woodsmoke May 11 2004, 06:33 PM Hehehe; Muggy, the first thing I thought when I saw that picture.... "Archie! Here boy!" Let's see how many other geeks of that particular brand catch the reference. Posted by: Matthew May 11 2004, 08:54 PM I'd post a nude pic of myself or so if Lokmer agrees to take the pics and post them on here in some future visit to his place. Matthew Posted by: GodzillaBless May 12 2004, 05:24 PM QUOTE (ericf @ May 10 2004, 03:50 PM) Hmm Zilla... nice. Just one question that has always made me wonder: Why do naturists/nudists always (usually) wear shoes? Sorry, maybe it is just me. But you look very good and comfortable in your skin. Oftentimes upon going outside you encounter the same risks from stinging insects and broken glass that you would if you were clothed. Hence the shoes. I know, it looks ludicrous. Posted by: ericf May 12 2004, 05:29 PM Well, I am a chronic barefooter so I never wear shoes outside of work. It just seems weird. Nudists not even wearing just flip-flops most of the time... shoes AND socks seem to be standard fare... But that is just me. I wish I had the balls (pun intended) to be naked more often. Posted by: GodzillaBless May 13 2004, 01:58 AM Try it..... you might like it. Posted by: ericf May 13 2004, 08:30 PM Oh, I have tried it and I know I like it. But the situation right now is not good for it. I live at home with my fundy mother. I used to just be naked all the time in my dorm room. And I have been naked around different people. But never outside with the exception of skinny dipping. Posted by: mandylibra1979 May 13 2004, 08:33 PM QUOTE (ericf @ May 12 2004, 09:29 PM) Well, I am a chronic barefooter so I never wear shoes outside of work. It just seems weird. Nudists not even wearing just flip-flops most of the time... shoes AND socks seem to be standard fare... But that is just me. I wish I had the balls (pun intended) to be naked more often. Me too, Eric . . . I am as you wrote, "a chronic barefooter". Posted by: sexkitten May 14 2004, 05:54 AM Okay... so where did tasteful nude images get moved to? Posted by: yanra May 14 2004, 07:25 PM They weren't tasteful enough I guess. Posted by: ericf May 14 2004, 07:44 PM lol, no it isn't that at all. I think the mods decided to pull them until they decided if they should be available to everyone. I think they freaked because a 15 year old posted on the thread -- no nudity just posted a comment -- but they started to re-evaluate if it was okay to have it in the open. I have a feeling they will move it back -- probably with a disclaimer. Especially considering the gallery on this site has more graphic stuff. Just pm a mod who is on and ask them to move it back, if they can. I have a feeling it hasn't been done yet because the thread was locked and the mods don't have permission to move it themselves. Posted by: ericf May 15 2004, 03:20 PM There, I knew they would put it back. I wonder what the whole issue was. Posted by: jjacksonRIAB May 16 2004, 01:53 PM As I said in the SUPER SECRET SECTION, freedom of association. The security in this regard is necessary. Great idea! Posted by: woodsmoke May 17 2004, 03:43 PM No one caught my Red Dwarf reference. Now I'm sad. *pout* Posted by: Iconoclastithon Jun 19 2004, 02:45 PM what would be the point, other than to arpuse each other-which would make it porn?. It seems to me{and I'm totally cool w/public nudity} but the fact that people want it so bad on here and are winking each other, be honest guys are'nt you just gonna use it as mastabatory material, which would make it porn and expolitive itself? Just a thought Posted by: Doug2 Jun 19 2004, 04:19 PM I've seen a lot of persons on this board nude, and never used it to masterbate. (Though most people on the board are mature enough to see that as a compliment even if it did happen) The point is to allow people some freedom beyond the concept that their bodies are dirty. It's great to post a pic and be complimented on it. It's fun for everyone and a good bonding and mutual reciprocity experience. Posted by: Killswitch Jun 19 2004, 04:25 PM I agree with Doug number 2. I dont think it has anything to do with needing a fix for getting off (thats what the internet is BASED on, remember!); just harmless fun. Posted by: Lokmer Jun 19 2004, 04:37 PM Doug2 nailed it in one -Lokmer Posted by: Fweethawt Jun 19 2004, 06:10 PM I've never even thought of polishing my dolphin while looking at the pictures posted on this site. As a matter of fact, I rarely even give them a second glance. Posted by: formerfundie Jun 19 2004, 11:23 PM QUOTE (Fweethawt @ Jun 19 2004, 06:10 PM) As a matter of fact, I rarely even give them a second glance. Well, okay, I've been wrong before, but...are you really on the up and up here? Really? Posted by: Fweethawt Jun 19 2004, 11:36 PM QUOTE (formerfundie @ Jun 20 2004, 03:23 AM) QUOTE (Fweethawt @ Jun 19 2004, 06:10 PM) As a matter of fact, I rarely even give them a second glance. Well, okay, I've been wrong before, but...are you really on the up and up here? Really? FF, With the utmost sincerity, I can honestly say that I've spent more time viewing the photos in the album that Bob has provided than I have looking at the nude photos here. Every once in a while I stop in there just to see who has been added. Posted by: biggles7268 Jun 19 2004, 11:40 PM FF you have my permission to use my pics as total porn if you want to Posted by: formerfundie Jun 19 2004, 11:51 PM QUOTE (biggles7268 @ Jun 19 2004, 11:40 PM) FF you have my permission to use my pics as total porn if you want to (Okay, I'll have to say that for some reason unbeknownst to moi - this is by far my most favoritest smiley!) Thank you Biggles, I'll keep that in mind! Or should I say I'll keep you in mind? Oh, and Fweetie - I look at all the pics - nude and otherwise - I'm just weird that way, I guess. Posted by: Fweethawt Jun 19 2004, 11:54 PM QUOTE (formerfundie @ Jun 20 2004, 03:51 AM) Oh, and Fweetie - I look at all the pics - nude and otherwise - I'm just weird that way, I guess. I look at them all too. I was just trying to make a point up there to someone who thinks that the pictures that are posted here are used for wacking material by everybody. That's all. Posted by: biggles7268 Jun 20 2004, 12:02 AM considering he's got a whoppin 6 posts it really isn't any of his business, he's free to not look at anything that bothers him. Posted by: ericf Jun 20 2004, 12:49 AM I will be honest and admit that some of the images members have posted have cause me to seek "release." The first one of which I never requested but was sent to. She knows who she is. The fact of the matter is that many of these images are non-sexual to me because of the connection I have to the people on this board. The people here are more family than friends. But sometimes they are really sexy family members... ugh, incest... wait where the hell am I going with this. Anyway, I would not encourage anyone here to post pictures because I need something to spank to. I have a perfectly good connection to the internet and can find plenty of porn when I need it. And most of the time, I don't need a visual right in my face anyway. One of these days I will post a picture of myself... and THAT will be used by me for getting off... I am a SEXY BITCH... YEAH!!! Posted by: formerfundie Jun 20 2004, 08:07 AM QUOTE (Doug2 @ Jun 19 2004, 04:19 PM) I've seen a lot of persons on this board nude, and never used it to masterbate. (Though most people on the board are mature enough to see that as a compliment even if it did happen) The point is to allow people some freedom beyond the concept that their bodies are dirty. It's great to post a pic and be complimented on it. It's fun for everyone and a good bonding and mutual reciprocity experience. Excellent response - as usual. Oh, and I think that anyone that has a problem with whether people are masturbating to anything - regardless of who, what, why, when, where and how - should take some time out of their hard-earned busy day and plow through the "do you masturbate?" thread to get over the stigma associated with that, too. The point here also is to get over sexual repression imposed through a false belief system, is it not? Isn't it to embrace human sexuality? Posted by: formerfundie Jun 20 2004, 08:22 AM QUOTE (ericf @ Jun 20 2004, 12:49 AM) One of these days I will post a picture of myself... and THAT will be used by me for getting off... I am a SEXY BITCH... YEAH!!! Seems somewhere in my recollection - oh - a waaaaaayyyyy long time ago (and I'm an older bitch so it speaks volumes that I can remember that far back and I'm still somewhat lucid), similar words were spoken? FF *singing - 'cause I can't whistle worth a damn - or at all for that matter* <<<whistle while you wait...da ta da ta da da dum>>> As far as you bein' a sexy bitch - I'm sure truer words were never spoken. ( I mean that in all honesty and sincerity and with no sarcasm intended there.) Posted by: Iconoclastithon Jun 21 2004, 09:32 AM Hey all. By the way I meant no offense, nor did I mean to sound like a religous prude. Though I may no longer be a christian, I don't wish to promote things that are possibly exploitive and may indeed just give fuel to the religionists to claim we all left the faith to pursue selfish lusts{as opposed to pursuing reason}. i also did not mean to judge your hearts or intnets{as I'm not god-I don't know them}. I meant to say that the vary posing of this question or request seems to be of an intent that we 'want' to see each other naked soley for the purpose of gettin off to each others beautiful naked bodies. I'm not a religionist anymore, but I can say that I do believe that sex is still sacred in some way and not to be treated like a game or joke. Public nudity is fine, but is the itent of the stated question of this very thread? See, lets take nudist beaches, they are allright. The intent of it is not sexually exploitive and selfish in nature-the intent of them is to be comfortable in our natural naked state. The same goes for nude paintings and art, and if pictures could be taken and publicly displayed of nude people merely for admiring the beauty of the human body outside of dooing it for the sole purpose of expoliting ourselves and each other for selfish sexual gratification-then it would be all good. But when I first read theis thread-it appeared to me{and forgive me if I'm incorrect} that the motive was so that we could look at each other merely as sexual objects. I'm sorry, but I do not see objetifying and exploiting ourselves and each other as sexual liberation, I se it as sexual abuse and expolitiation. one does not need to be a revealed religionist or moralist, one does not even need to believe there in any kind spiritualk relaity of noncorporreal beings or deity{s} to recognize these things as exploitive an aweome gift and ability-called sexuality. We can be sexually liberated from the binds guilt,fear and confusion that religion places on sexuality, without going to the opposite extremes. Anyways, I mean, I'm not ashamed of my natural naked being, and I'd hope nobody here is either, and if the intent has nothing to do w/exploitation-than dudes-lets go for it, but if the intent is to objectify each other as the motives of some of these posts/responses would seem to suggest-then out of respect for our sexual dignity-lets refrain. Can we stop people from objectifying the nude pictures, well...fuck no, we can't do that even when they have clothes on in their pictures. I'm just hoping that we all wish to have nuide pictures on the net on ths site for more beautiful reasons, not exploitive ones. Anyways, What I'm saying is just some concerns and thoughts I have., i don't mean to say it is right or wrong to have public nudity or nude pictures on here or noe, or that is morally right or wrong to masterbate as we enjoy each others beauty, I mean,. whom am I to say what is morally right or wrong? I just merely mean to post some concerns I have about our motives, if I'm overly worried-then may I lighten up, but if my concerns are legit-may that fact show forth. anyways, peace to you all Iconoclastithon Posted by: ericf Jun 21 2004, 11:00 AM QUOTE (brick @ May 6 2004, 08:58 AM) It occurred while reading reach's 'Self-Body image' thread that some members might like to post more revealing pics of themselves for the benefit of their self-esteem (as was done without ceremony by sexkitten, no offence intended kitty!) or just to parade around and play 'look at me' (hey, why not! we're all adults here and there is nothing wrong with the naked body, IMO) Express your thoughts and/or concerns....and remember that it would be a thread for TASTEFUL pics, not a freakin' porn thread! lol Iconoclastithon, That was the first post that started this thread. The intent was not to produce pornography but to allow people to love their body image. QUOTE (Iconoclastithon) one does not need to be a revealed religionist or moralist, one does not even need to believe there in any kind spiritualk relaity of noncorporreal beings or deity{s} to recognize these things as exploitive an aweome gift and ability-called sexuality. A person does not need to be those things to "recognize" that. But it doesn't make it true and it doesn't mean that everyone recognizes it. Naked pictures, even those meant to be "invigorating" are not exploitive... I believe we have covered this before on a thread. There is no universal law that makes posing nude for other people a losing experience for anyone. You may, personally, believe that -- and you have a right to -- but that doesn't make it universal. QUOTE But when I first read theis thread-it appeared to me{and forgive me if I'm incorrect} that the motive was so that we could look at each other merely as sexual objects. I'm sorry, but I do not see objetifying and exploiting ourselves and each other as sexual liberation, I se it as sexual abuse and expolitiation. The motive was increased self-esteem. In many cases you see comments expressing that someone is very sexually attractive... in many of these cases the comments are made because sometimes people want to hear them. People want to be told they are attractive and hot. No one here is an object or is exploited. So, does this mean you won't be posting a picture? Posted by: Iconoclastithon Jun 21 2004, 12:11 PM Thank you Ericf for helping me to better understand things. I understand now. If a thread was to be started w/nude pictures of everyone it would not offend me. Would I post, probably not, not so much for moral reasons as I am uncomfortable w/my thin and scolioses ridden body. I guess my concern about it all came out of the fact that I saw some posts that seemed to be dooing more than just admiring sexually attractiveness, and seemed like the poepl may be more orgy/porn oriented people. But I guess, even if the pictures of people were placed on here fully clothed, if someone is determined to exploit them in their own heads-they are gonna do it whether that someone is nude or clothed. Bare w/me, I'm slowly overcoming some of the relgious morality I once had in full, fragments of it all remain. And I guess if someone was turned on by one of the nake dpictures that it may not be soooo bad because they could get turned on by that person if they were fully clothed-which is natural. I guess I was just suspicious of 'SOME' peoples motives, including my own. This process of de-indroctinating ones mind from religous morality takes awhile, but I'm learning. again, bare w/me. I'm willing to learn and admit when I'm wrong, or at least that some of my preconceptions may be inncorrect. Thannx for your well thought out responses to me on this, on other boards of this nature when I've posed moral concerns of any kind I've sometimes been called down as if I'm basing it all on religion and am not actually de-christianized{but hey the process takes time}. Peace to ya. Posted by: Lokmer Jun 21 2004, 12:46 PM QUOTE (Iconoclastithon @ Jun 21 2004, 01:11 PM) I guess my concern about it all came out of the fact that I saw some posts that seemed to be dooing more than just admiring sexually attractiveness, and seemed like the poepl may be more orgy/porn oriented people. I think you may be mistaking camraderie for exploitation - most of the people here (particularly those who have posted on this thread) are comfortable with each other and find each other to be people with attractive personalities. There's a lot of love in the room, so to speak. It's a very different thing hearing from a total stranger "Holy shit! I'd tap that!" and hearing from a friend "Oh my god! You're very sexy and it's turning me on!" or "Damn girl! " or similar. A great many people here have not been allowed to be sexually self-posessed. Nudity isn't inherently about fucking, but there is a sexual vulnerability that goes with posting your nude self in public, for friends. The online equivalent to whistles and cat-calls that you're seeing are exchanged between people in the same friendly manner as you'd see exchanged between girlfriends at a bridal shower when the bride is opening gifts of lingerie (i.e. the emotion expressed is genuine and serious, but done in a playful way) - perhaps a bit more sexually loaded on occasion, because many of us DO find many of the rest of us genuinely arousing rather than just acknowledging that someone is sexy or cute. Trust me, if someone found a catcall disturbing, people on this thread would hear about it. More to the point, most of the people here know each other well enough that those who are comfortable with the wolf-whistles get them, and those who aren't get a more verbose type of pat on the back. Hope that helps -Lokmer Posted by: rainyday8169 Jun 26 2004, 07:17 AM "Tasteful nudes" hmmmmmm Taste is a matter of opinion ........ who is the one that decides what is and what is not "tasteful" maybe you could just let the pictures be posted and have a poll for each one so people can vote on whether or not it is tastefully done. I paint and many people (people I would call prudes) have called my art pornographic but of course I think it is tastefully done (well most of it is anyway) Posted by: biggles7268 Jun 26 2004, 08:03 AM I think as long as it's not animal porn enough people here will consider it tastefull for it to be ok. Posted by: sexkitten Jun 26 2004, 08:40 PM QUOTE (biggles7268 @ Jun 26 2004, 08:03 AM) I think as long as it's not animal porn enough people here will consider it tastefull for it to be ok. Depends on what you mean by "http://www.garrettwalker.com/today_at/content/images/first.jpg." Posted by: rainyday8169 Jun 26 2004, 09:30 PM (IconoclastithonJun 21 2004, 09:32 AM) QUOTE I can say that I do believe that sex is still sacred in some way and not to be treated like a game or joke. good grief Iconoclastithon! looking at nude pictures is not the same as having sex and get this.............. some people look at nude pictures without even jerking off. If you actually believe that sex is sacred I find that a bit born again-ish but even so, I highly doubt that it would be any less sacred if you looked at a naked picture even if you did jerk off to it. and what makes you think that being naked for sexual reasons is such a terrible thing anyway? Are you fat? I have noticed that a lot of fat chicks have problems with being naked Posted by: Kaiser Soze Jul 1 2004, 02:41 AM I suppose it all depends on how you classify nudity. Erotica, and appreciation of the human body is not the same thing as porn. I don't like porn; I find it pointless, boring and most of the time more than a little foetid. That said I do like to see good erotica, and how the human body (male and female) can be appreciated through art such as pohotgraphy. Germaine Grear recently released an album of artworks and photographs designed to promote the aesthetic and sensual beauty of the male body, and some of the nude photographs in there are just stunning, and when I say stunning I mean arousing in both a sexual and intellectual sense. Posted by: whisper Jul 1 2004, 06:17 AM I picked 'Yes, I support the idea but wouldn't participate.' Unless someone wants to look at my feet. I was told by an artist that I have 'perfect' feet. Posted by: bob Jul 1 2004, 06:24 AM QUOTE (whisper @ Jul 1 2004, 06:17 AM) I picked 'Yes, I support the idea but wouldn't participate.' Unless someone wants to look at my feet. I was told by an artist that I have 'perfect' feet. Then, by all means...lets see them. Posted by: whisper Jul 1 2004, 01:03 PM QUOTE (bob @ Jul 1 2004, 09:24 AM) QUOTE (whisper @ Jul 1 2004, 06:17 AM) I picked 'Yes, I support the idea but wouldn't participate.' Unless someone wants to look at my feet. I was told by an artist that I have 'perfect' feet. Then, by all means...lets see them. Damn! Now I gotta get my computer fixed and a digital camera or I'm a tease. This could get expensive... Posted by: Karl Jul 1 2004, 01:35 PM QUOTE (Iconoclastithon @ Jun 21 2004, 04:11 PM) ....This process of de-indroctinating ones mind from religous morality takes awhile, but I'm learning. again, bare w/me.... And peace to you as well... IMO, there is nothing "moral" about religionist guilt and shame-mongering concerning the human body. Lots of people have been really messed up by it. The following website will give you an idea of what it means to live in freedom. Hopefully it will help to make you more comfortable with what is perfectly......Natural. http://www.enature.net/body.htm Of course, all of us will continue to be here to support you, as you cleanse your mind from the poison of fundamentalism. Best regards, K Posted by: rainyday8169 Jul 1 2004, 04:28 PM QUOTE (whisper @ Jul 1 2004, 06:17 AM) I was told by an artist that I have 'perfect' feet. QUOTE I was told by an artist that I have 'perfect' feet. I have disgusting feet, they are square-ish fat size 6 extra wide. I don’t even call em my feet, I call em my Barney Rubbles and since I am so totally shameless, I go barefoot all summer long. I don't care who sees my Barney rubbles as long as no one ever again tries to kiss them or rub em. That just grosses me out. Only other feet should touch feet. I’m just sayin' p.s. you can get a cheap digi-cam for under 20 bucks and a cheap web-cam that takes grainy photos for like 8 bucks so no more excuses, show us your feet! Posted by: I Broke Free Jul 1 2004, 04:32 PM QUOTE (rainyday8169 @ Jul 1 2004, 08:28 PM) I have disgusting feet, they are square-ish fat size 6 extra wide. I don’t even call em my feet, I call em my Barney Rubbles and since I am so totally shameless, I go barefoot all summer long. I don't care who sees my Barney rubbles as long as no one ever again tries to kiss them or rub em. That just grosses me out. Only other feet should touch feet. I now have this overwhelming desire to suck your toes. Posted by: rainyday8169 Jul 1 2004, 04:54 PM That's only because you've never seem my feet. Even the last man that thought he was in love with me couldn't help but make a comment about the rubbles. I guess it was our 4th date, if you call hanging out in the yard drinking beer a date, he said, out of the blue and in front of his parents as he held my leg up for all to see "check out the dogs on this girl" them we all had a good laugh on the poor Rubbles, who thankfully don’t give a fat flying rats ass what anyone thinks of them. Maybe I should tell you......... Sometimes, especially if I wear nylon sox or hose, my Barney Rubbles stink like vinegar Only worse. (and one of these days that quote thingy is gonna work for me) Posted by: I Broke Free Jul 1 2004, 05:04 PM Have you seen the episode of "King of the Hill" where they deal with Peggy's feet? Absolutely hysterical!!! Posted by: rainyday8169 Jul 1 2004, 06:08 PM I don't think I've seen that one hey, is that a recent picture of you? you look aboyt 12 years old Posted by: Fweethawt Jul 1 2004, 06:38 PM QUOTE (rainyday8169 @ Jul 1 2004, 10:08 PM) hey, is that a recent picture of you? you look aboyt 12 years old Hey Rainyday, Some members here have pictures of themselves in their profile. In order to see it, all you have to do is click on their name. Go ahead, click on IBF's name...... It might clear some things up for ya. Posted by: rainyday8169 Jul 1 2004, 06:53 PM ahhhhhh O K, so let me see if I got that straight, all I have to do is put my mouse thingy over the name and click? Right click or left click? Then what do I do after I click? .............. Thanks. I actually knew that but after clicking a few and seeing no picture, I gave up since I have a crappy dial up connection and it takes 3 days to load each page. I'm gonna go look now tho, you wait here ok? I'll come back soon and deal with you Why don't ya really be a dear and tell me why that quote thingy works for sometimes and sometimes not? Posted by: Fweethawt Jul 1 2004, 09:32 PM QUOTE (rainyday8169 @ Jul 1 2004, 10:53 PM) Why don't ya really be a dear and tell me why that quote thingy works for sometimes and sometimes not? The only thing that I can think of as to why you have trouble using the quote feature, is the fact that you are on a dial-up connection. When you are here at the forum, do you find that you have to log-in several times because for some reason or another you keep getting involuntarily logged-out while making your way through the forum? Posted by: whisper Jul 2 2004, 04:19 AM QUOTE (rainyday8169 @ Jul 1 2004, 07:28 PM) QUOTE (whisper @ Jul 1 2004, 06:17 AM) I was told by an artist that I have 'perfect' feet. QUOTE I was told by an artist that I have 'perfect' feet. I have disgusting feet, they are square-ish fat size 6 extra wide. I don’t even call em my feet, I call em my Barney Rubbles and since I am so totally shameless, I go barefoot all summer long. I don't care who sees my Barney rubbles as long as no one ever again tries to kiss them or rub em. That just grosses me out. Only other feet should touch feet. I’m just sayin' p.s. you can get a cheap digi-cam for under 20 bucks and a cheap web-cam that takes grainy photos for like 8 bucks so no more excuses, show us your feet! Oh, for a minute there I thought you REALLY liked reading about my feet. I still have trouble with the quote option. Try to do a preview before posting that way you’ll see if it’s gonna look okay [of course I forget to do that too…and spell check.] Barney Rubble feet huh? I used to call mine Fred Flintstone feet until I met this artist. Artists are soooo creative. Looks like the rest of you makes up for your feet from what I’ve seen. As foot massages go...if done well a man can just about have his way with me... Actually I do have digital camera. That caused my computer problems, I think. I bought it used then tried to load the software on my computer when all of a sudden my drivers went nuts. Had to do a factory restore and yet my cd and dvd drives still won't work. I'm not technologically savvy so I'm at a loss of what to do next except find someone to get it all straightened out. What a pain in the ass! Posted by: biggles7268 Jul 2 2004, 06:07 AM Rainyday before you post make sure you have both opening and closing tags like this [QUOTE.][/QUOTE.] minus the period at the end( I put that there so it wouldn't actualy do it lol ) Posted by: I Broke Free Jul 2 2004, 07:41 AM QUOTE (rainyday8169 @ Jul 1 2004, 10:08 PM) I don't think I've seen that one hey, is that a recent picture of you? you look aboyt 12 years old I see that Fwee has helped you to see the "Real Me." The avatar photo was taken in 1975 at the age of 15. I have decided to stick with this avatar for awhile. It was taken just a few months before I was absorbed by the Morg Collective and had the life sucked out of me. Do you like the Bobby Brady shirt? Posted by: rainyday8169 Jul 2 2004, 08:22 AM Love it! I have a photo of me in 1974, I was 5. I'm wearing a zodiac dress with a collar that screams "1974" and I have yarn "ribbons" in my hair oh heck, I'll just post the pic Posted by: Jaded Jul 2 2004, 03:44 PM With all the talk of nasty feet I just couldn't resist. This is what happens when you spend the summers near a rocky beach growing up and only put shoes on to go to church. Of course standing on them most of the day and running for a few years didn't improve them any. My last girlfriend used to occasionally refer to me as "snaggle toes." Sorry if I gross anyone out Posted by: I Broke Free Jul 2 2004, 03:49 PM QUOTE (Jaded @ Jul 2 2004, 07:44 PM) Sorry if I gross anyone out They don't look that bad. Your (ring?) toe looks a bit swollen. I get flack from everyone regarding my shoe wearing habits. I never put on shoes during the summer unless I have to. I love going barefoot, and I don't care how dirty they get. It is a wonderful freeing and liberating experience to go shoeless! Posted by: yanra Jul 2 2004, 04:23 PM Hey Rainyday, What a cutie you are. I bet the teachers loved you! I use to love walking around barefoot outdoors too when I was young. Loved the feeling of the hot sand between my toes. Although the rocks didn't feel too good. But it meant it was SUMMER! Posted by: Doug2 Jul 2 2004, 06:43 PM QUOTE (whisper @ Jul 2 2004, 05:19 AM) As foot massages go...if done well a man can just about have his way with me... I loooove foot massages. I have been needing one all day. Want to trade one? Posted by: whisper Jul 5 2004, 09:18 PM QUOTE (Doug2 @ Jul 2 2004, 09:43 PM) QUOTE (whisper @ Jul 2 2004, 05:19 AM) As foot massages go...if done well a man can just about have his way with me... I loooove foot massages. I have been needing one all day. Want to trade one? Just got back in town today. Went to the in-laws for the 4th. I took a lot of long walks, couldn't take the mother-in-law. Surprisingly my feet feel great right now, but I suffer with plantar fashitis (not sure of spelling) and heel spurs. Just noticed there is a topic on cyber sex. Maybe we can get together and discuss cyber foot massages and find mutual satisfaction (chuckle). Posted by: rainyday8169 Jul 6 2004, 09:09 AM Jaded, your little piggy that had none looks a bit swollen. Is that normal I mean normal for you since there is nothing normal about feet in my opinion. Posted by: humanwill Jul 9 2004, 06:27 PM man IBF... your one hunka dude.... rainy... if he offers a foot massage girl... go get it... Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com) © Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com) |